Probably because it’s the only social media site where content is truly king. With Digg and other similar sites you have a much better shot if you have friends to send shouts to, if you submit your articles at certain times during the day, if you’re a top digger and so on. With StumbleUpon, all you need is a good article and the traffic will follow (if you submit to the correct category).
The screenshot below is the traffic from a new blog I started on October 28 I think.
One of the articles was submitted to StumbleUpon on October 31st. It was very successful with the StumbleUpon users, and in the last 16 days it brought me 45,000 visitors and 76,000 page views to that article, 30+ comments, the first 20-25 subscribers of the blog, and ~$14.
The money is irrelevant here, the CTR was absolutely horrible, the subscriber number is what interests me. Yesterday, more then two weeks since it was submitted, it brought 1,000 visitors to that article. And that’s without having a powerful account or taking into consideration the time of day for the submission.
True, a top stumbler can boost your initial number of visitors, but ultimately you need good content to be successful, and I think that’s where Digg is losing the battle.
A good start if you want to use StumbleUpon is an article from The Lost Art Of Blogging, called A Guide To StumbleUpon: Understanding And Beating The System. It’s well worth the read, and if you’re new to social media, you can also take a look at his article, Introduction To Social Media And Social Media Marketing.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!


